← Teams

MPRC-Yu

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.73 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Yuko Hopman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Sue Gregoire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.59
Laurence Dupray
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.54
John Yu
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.32
Jeffrey Gates
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Lamone Voravongseng
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Jeff Anhaltzer
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Josette Zervic
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kathy Cook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Julie Ahn
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.09
Michelle Dombek
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Yuko Hopman
116W–79L career
0%99%0%
4.18
4.5
Sue Gregoire
120W–80L career
2%98%0%
4.12
3.5
Laurence Dupray
112W–69L career
0%58%42%
3.59
4
John Yu
136W–64L career
22%78%0%
3.54
3.5
Jeffrey Gates
101W–93L career
0%99%1%
3.32
3.5
Lamone Voravongseng
82W–52L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Jeff Anhaltzer
90W–97L career
0%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Josette Zervic
63W–53L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Kathy Cook
85W–36L career
6%94%0%
3.17
3.5
Julie Ahn
66W–62L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Michelle Dombek
38W–54L career
13%87%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.