Teams

CVTA BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-04vs TTA BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Johnson / Thomas Lastick vs Scott McCool / Paul Sattizahn1-6, 0-6
2024-08-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Tessier / Michael Menassa vs Jeffrey Johnson / Glen Shumaker4-6, 3-6
2024-08-21vs BTA-IBM GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Menassa / Thomas Lastick vs Ron Phillips / Tom Galey6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesThomas Tessier / Mark Johnson vs Scott Hemphill / Michael Pierce7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-14vs CVTA GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesThomas Lastick / Mark Johnson vs Jason Sutula / Luke Trautwein2-6, 5-7
2024-08-07vs NJ GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Menassa / Thomas Lastick vs Travis Staebell / Greg Leaver3-6, 2-6
2024-07-31vs TTA BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesThomas Lastick / Jordan Fritz vs Scott McCool / Paul Sattizahn3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Tessier / Stephen Cook vs Louis Iantorno / Andrew Eastridge6-1, 6-2
2024-07-24vs RCC GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Tessier / Andrew Jones vs Jeffrey Johnson / Philip Wang6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Jordan Fritz
published
3.60
Timothy Tyrrell
published
3.57
Andrew Jones
published 4
3.48
Thomas Lastick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Mark Johnson
published
3.42
Stephen Cook
published
3.40
Thomas Tessier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Michael Menassa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Tessier + Thomas Lastick5455% gamesnot enough data
Mark Johnson + Stephen Cook044 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Tessier + Timothy Tyrrell134 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Tessier + Stephen Cook134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Menassa + Thomas Lastick123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Lastick + Timothy Tyrrell123 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Tyrrell + Stephen Cook303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Fritz
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Timothy Tyrrell
18W–20L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Andrew Jones
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Thomas Lastick
58W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Mark Johnson
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
Stephen Cook
8W–24L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Thomas Tessier
82W–118L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Michael Menassa
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.