Teams

MARIN TC 55AW8.0A

2023 ADULT 55&Over · Women 8.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Merilee Bordin
published
3.85
Karen Fairty
published
3.85
Suzanne Seavey
published
3.81
Nancy Martin
published
3.69
Francie Burkhard
published
3.68
Anne Sullivan
published 4
3.67
Michelle Douglas
published
3.63
Kris Hinckley
published
3.58
Susan Swezy
published
3.56
Tina Skouras
published
3.53
Kimberly Minahen
published
3.52
Carol Treadway
published 3.5
3.42
Debbie Miskell
published 3.5
3.35
Germana Fabbri
published
3.32
Brenda Dorian
published 3.5
3.25
Margo Holt
published
3.13
Jamie Papadimos
published
3.11
Molie Malone
published
Hilary Gamache
published
Maria Mazzaferri
published
Suzanne Kawahara
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Dorian + Carol Treadway5165% games+11.1% vs expected
Merilee Bordin + Kris Hinckley3263% gamesnot enough data
Tina Skouras + Anne Sullivan224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Skouras + Michelle Douglas224 matchesnot enough data
Merilee Bordin + Karen Fairty303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Merilee Bordin
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
Karen Fairty
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
Suzanne Seavey
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Nancy Martin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Francie Burkhard
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Anne Sullivan
16W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Michelle Douglas
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Kris Hinckley
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Susan Swezy
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Tina Skouras
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.56
Kimberly Minahen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Carol Treadway
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Debbie Miskell
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Germana Fabbri
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Brenda Dorian
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Margo Holt
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Jamie Papadimos
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Molie Malone
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
3.11
Hilary Gamache
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria Mazzaferri
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzanne Kawahara
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.