Teams

Muncy/DV/Foothills

2024 Foothills Tri-Level - 18 & over · Women's Group C 3.5-4.0-4.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-07-31vs Owens/Pebble Creek/FhillsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / Amanda Berry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPam Muncy / Mandy Poplin vs Dawn Owens / Candace Scott3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Reese / Alexa Gerbrands vs Ellen Stupka / Tracy Nestor3-6, 1-6
2024-07-24vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPam Muncy / Mandy Poplin vs Kerri Oakley / Lynne Place3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Turbett / Alexa Gerbrands vs Marsha Diamonti / Taylor Newton6-2, 6-1
2024-07-23vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMandy Poplin / Susan Westphal vs Courtney Haan / Liza Simpson6-2, 6-1
2024-07-10vs Owens/Pebble Creek/FhillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / Amanda Berry vs Karen Tonks / Candace Scott6-4, 7-5
2024-07-09vs LHCC/Horyza/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Murphy / Mandy Poplin vs Deirdre Bolter / Blair Tate3-6, 6-7
2024-06-26vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Berry / Jeanne Ann Lewis vs Amanda Moose / Tammy Dennis2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMandy Poplin / Pam Muncy vs Kerri Oakley / Sarah Wohlbruck7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJill Reese / Marie Shuford vs Tracy Kiefer / Kelli Schmidt0-6, 2-6
2024-06-25vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Pillow / Mandy Poplin vs Kelly Walker / Kelli Schmidt3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-06-18vs Oakley/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesYuriko Roten / Marie Shuford vs Nancy James / Margie Henry2-6, 3-6
2024-06-12vs Owens/Pebble Creek/FhillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / Amanda Berry vs Karen Tonks / Candace Scott6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Turbett / Alexa Gerbrands vs Megan Reid / Cori Peters6-2, 6-3
2024-06-05vs Graff/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarol Almond / Amanda Berry vs Shelby Graff / Kerri Oakley7-6, 6-2
2024-06-04vs LHCC/Blue/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Reese / Marie Shuford vs Tracy Brown / Jackie Finley7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group C 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Blythe Parker
published 4
4.07
Amanda Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Carol Almond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Pam Muncy
published
3.73
Mandy Poplin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Jeanne Ann Lewis
published
3.65
Alexa Gerbrands
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.63
Melissa Turbett
published
3.32
Jill Reese
published
3.12
Marie Shuford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dru Henson
published
Katherine Beekman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Almond + Amanda Berry16657% games+9.0% vs expected
Mandy Poplin + Alexa Gerbrands6256% games+4.0% vs expected
Marie Shuford + Mandy Poplin2742% games−3.2% vs expected
Amanda Berry + Mandy Poplin9171% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blythe Parker
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
4.12
4.5
Amanda Berry
156W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Carol Almond
117W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
Pam Muncy
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Mandy Poplin
124W–71L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Jeanne Ann Lewis
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Alexa Gerbrands
51W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.65
Melissa Turbett
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Jill Reese
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Marie Shuford
70W–89L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Dru Henson
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katherine Beekman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.