Teams

DePriest/40/7.5/Combo/Reds

2025 LAF Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 7.5 LAF (40&O) Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-30vs Hains/40/7.5/Combo/CCRRWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Petry / Tamara Rahim vs Christine LeMaire / Christie Maranto6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMeng DePriest / Corina Melancon vs Judy Siefker / Leslie Doucet6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaula Pratt / Connie Pritchard vs Donna Comeaux / Nita Harrington6-3, 6-2
2025-08-27vs Hains/40/7.5/Combo/CCRRWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Quinn / Tonya Romero vs Christine LeMaire / Perla Vidos6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Petry / Connie Pritchard vs Nita Harrington / Donna Comeaux6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Pratt / Nicole Angers vs AMY HAINS / Leslie Doucet6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 LAF (40&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Penny Ayo
published
3.66
Julie Petry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Connie Pritchard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Meng DePriest
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Tammy Broussard
published
3.30
Julie Conner
published
3.28
Corina Melancon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.15
Paula Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Angers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tamara Rahim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tonya Romero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meng DePriest + Corina Melancon4546% games−2.1% vs expected
Meng DePriest + Nicole Angers134 matchesnot enough data
Corina Melancon + Julie Petry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Penny Ayo
27W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
Julie Petry
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Connie Pritchard
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Meng DePriest
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.44
Tammy Broussard
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Julie Conner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
4
Corina Melancon
10W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.28
Paula Pratt
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Nicole Angers
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tamara Rahim
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tonya Romero
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.