Teams

Eat Play Love - Gabaldon

2022 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.93 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-27vs T6- Chantilly/ OligiveWon 20
W#1 SinglesCathy Huh vs Sohee Chu6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargaret Sita / Angie Wong vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-25vs T2- R.Creek/ MassarelliLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoanne Guerrera / Denise Jack vs Catherine Mitchell / Moira Smith3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Melissa Carruthers3-6, 2-6
2022-05-20vs Serves You Right - ZimmermanLost 02
L#2 SinglesCathy Huh vs Moo Hackett5-7, 4-4
L#3 DoublesTerry Cocozza / Kimberly Pease vs Lisa Zimmerman / Kate Donadoni2-6, 2-6
2022-04-29vs The 4th Team - RoelligLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Levanson / Joanne Guerrera vs Kim Klimkiewicz / Julie Borror7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Pease / Terry Cocozza vs Erin Gorman / Ami Chastain6-7, 1-6
2022-04-22vs T1- AVSP/ ProvidakesWon 20
W#2 SinglesMargaret Sita vs Tina Le6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTerry Cocozza / Kimberly Pease vs Alexandra Castleberry / Margaret Amy Flaherty7-5, 6-2
2022-04-08vs Smash Girls - Larner/HopkinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Levanson / Joanne Guerrera vs Jennifer DeCamp / Kristi Nault6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Joanne Guerrera
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.83
Margaret Sita
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Angie Wong
published 4
3.74
Caitlin Levanson
published 4
3.72
Cathy Huh
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.58
Brenda Bosch
published 4
3.48
Kimberly Pease
published
3.42
Terry Cocozza
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Margaret Navin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joanne Guerrera
112W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Margaret Sita
100W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Angie Wong
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Caitlin Levanson
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Cathy Huh
208W–128L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Brenda Bosch
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Kimberly Pease
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Terry Cocozza
230W–349L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Margaret Navin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.