Teams

MVS Vincent FWL A40-3.0W

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Lillian Jackson
published
3.35
Rachel Ogilvie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Kate Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Alyssa Vandenberg
published 3.5
3.23
Susan Popiel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Barb Cribar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Michelle Seymour
published
2.85
Linda Miller-Heys
published
2.74
Lozzy Albertelli
published
2.71
Tammy Silk
published
Jean Gawlak-Suggs
published
Shar Kraal
published
Susan Kirkwood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Seymour + Kate Vincent7167% games+14.3% vs expected
Kate Vincent + Rachel Ogilvie26960% games+11.0% vs expected
Barb Cribar + Kate Vincent19958% games+6.2% vs expected
Kate Vincent + Lillian Jackson6360% games+5.8% vs expected
Tammy Silk + Alyssa Vandenberg5252% games+5.5% vs expected
Lillian Jackson + Rachel Ogilvie2450% games+2.7% vs expected
Kate Vincent + Susan Popiel7158% games+2.6% vs expected
Tammy Silk + Susan Kirkwood7653% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lillian Jackson
54W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Rachel Ogilvie
81W–96L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Kate Vincent
154W–98L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Alyssa Vandenberg
53W–37L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Susan Popiel
49W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Barb Cribar
104W–90L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Michelle Seymour
60W–67L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Linda Miller-Heys
75W–77L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Christine Ferraiuolo-Dworak
56W–37L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lozzy Albertelli
41W–68L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.74
Tammy Silk
72W–56L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Jean Gawlak-Suggs
14W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shar Kraal
24W–45L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Kirkwood
31W–30L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.