Teams

PD18/McCabe/FCC

2026 STA Adult Combo 18 & Over - PD · Adult Men - 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-25vs PD18/Snyder/FTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSpencer Jordan / Bowman Hiller vs Matthew Lide / Anand Chokshi6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-11vs PD18/Snyder/FTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew McCabe / Bowman Hiller vs Austin Querubin / Caulder Christian6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRhys Miles / Spencer Jordan vs Anand Chokshi / Matthew Lide6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKyle Gunter / Daniel Rivera Cruz vs Cris Averette / Thinh Tran6-2, 6-1
2026-08-04vs PD18/Snyder/FTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyle Gunter / Daniel Rivera Cruz vs Christopher Lloyd / Anand Chokshi6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMatthew McCabe / Bowman Hiller vs Caulder Christian / Kristopher Lilly6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSpencer Jordan / Bryan Snipes vs Thinh Tran / Andrew Rogers6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-28vs PD18/Snyder/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Moore / Bryan Snipes vs Matthew Lide / Anand Chokshi5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBowman Hiller / Matthew McCabe vs Cris Averette / Kristopher Lilly6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKirk Watari / Spencer Jordan vs Caulder Christian / Austin Querubin3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Adult Men - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PD18/McCabe/FCC2163875

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Bowman Hiller
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.91
Kyle Gunter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Larry Rizzo
published
3.65
Bryan Snipes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Rhys Miles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
David Dubose
published 3.5
3.59
Kirk Watari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Daniel Rivera Cruz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.52
Wyatt Emerson
published
3.34
Spencer Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Hale Emerson
published
Matthew McCabe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bowman Hiller
14W–1L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
Kyle Gunter
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Larry Rizzo
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Bryan Snipes
27W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Rhys Miles
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
David Dubose
13W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.63
Kirk Watari
42W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Daniel Rivera Cruz
13W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Wyatt Emerson
6W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Spencer Jordan
17W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Hale Emerson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Matthew McCabe
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.