Teams

SBartle-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-01vs TPrinstein-HRLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Kruse vs Jesse Shoemaker-Ramsey4-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs CGonzales-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Cecilia Gonzales7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Isatu Kamara6-0, 6-0
2025-06-17vs GLoFrese-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Hannah Harvey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Alexa Hartenstein1-6, 3-6
2025-06-10vs MLong-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Kelsey Mortimore1-6, 1-6
2025-06-03vs CMills-UNCLost 02
L#1 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Jennifer Gates-Foster5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Meghan Fulton2-6, 2-6
2025-05-20vs JDeConto-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesChristine Kruse vs Santae Cooper1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Erica Shirts1-6, 0-6
2025-05-13vs LKulp-SVCWon 10
W#1 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Laura Gallaher7-5, 6-3
2025-05-06vs KMcWhorter-ENOLost 02
L#2 SinglesLiz Schaller vs Rebecca Walsh0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesShannon Bartle vs Kelly Travis1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Marta Robertson
published
2.82
Kirby Jethro
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.76
Lucy McMillan
published
2.70
Liz Schaller
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.62
Matalaba Napier
published
2.43
Shannon Bartle
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.27
Christine Kruse
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Schaller + Shannon Bartle21241% games+0.6% vs expected
Shannon Bartle + Christine Kruse1530% gamesnot enough data
Matalaba Napier + Shannon Bartle123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marta Robertson
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Kirby Jethro
37W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lucy McMillan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Matalaba Napier
11W–21L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Shannon Bartle
40W–155L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
2.5
Christine Kruse
16W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.