Teams

Johnson: Gusties

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 5.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-20vs SullivanWon 30
W#1 DoublesTyler Johnson / Luke Haddorff vs Yuv Kataria / Fernando Fonseca6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlex Senjem vs Lewis Jolly6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Punnoose / Sourabh Terakanambi vs Jack Chen / Matthew Sullivan6-4, 7-5
2025-03-13vs King 5.0 Winter '25Won 30
W#1 DoublesLuke Haddorff / Chase Johnson vs Anh Doan / Siddhesh Mahadeshwar6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJoseph Punnoose vs Nick Bates6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Senjem / Tyler Johnson vs Josh Stainer / Derek Kieckhafer6-4, 6-1
2025-02-27vs SullivanLost 02
L#1 DoublesTyler Johnson / Sourabh Terakanambi vs Fernando Fonseca / Antoine Noel4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnkit Gupta / Alex Senjem vs Matthew Sullivan / Yuv Kataria2-6, 4-6
2025-02-20vs MegerWon 10
W#1 DoublesLuke Haddorff / Alex Senjem vs Ryan Meger / Andrew McNutt5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-16vs MegerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuke Haddorff / Tyler Johnson vs Matthew Edin / Kevin Lewis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnkit Gupta vs Ryan Meger3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChase Johnson / Joseph Punnoose vs Thomas Prittinen / Ben Rode6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.89
Chase Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.56
Joseph Punnoose
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.53
Luke Haddorff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Alex Senjem
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Ankit Gupta
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Sourabh Terakanambi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luke Haddorff + Alex Senjem213 matchesnot enough data
Luke Haddorff + Sourabh Terakanambi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chase Johnson
28W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.89
Joseph Punnoose
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
4.56
Luke Haddorff
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.53
4.5
Alex Senjem
19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Ankit Gupta
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sourabh Terakanambi
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.