Teams

MV-McCoy/Roalsvig

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Patricia Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.29
Julie Arness
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
Michele Waite
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 0
Results6 ties
2018-12-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Waite / Nancy McCoy vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Donna Kennish6-3, 6-3
2018-11-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Waite / Jackie Harrison vs Susheela Jayapal / Terry Folen6-2, 6-3
2018-11-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Waite / Jackie Harrison vs Elda Nelson / Barbara Seatter2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2018-10-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichele Waite / Helen Donovan vs TERESA LAWHEAD / Anna Maria Savinar6-4, 6-3
2018-10-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Harrison / Michele Waite vs Tamera Carter / Jan Funkhouser6-1, 6-0
2018-09-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesMichele Waite / Helen Donovan vs Ann Kitchen / Angela Addington6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Patricia Morrison
89W–41L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Julie Arness
84W–57L career
1%98%1%
3.29
0
Michele Waite
50W–16L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.