Teams

SD 3.5WE Coronado TC/ McKissick

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesCaree Lesh / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Kristin Montgomery / Karen Sahd6-3, 7-6
2025-06-15vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ Yu-HansenWon 10
W#1 DoublesYvonne Bentle / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Cynthia Savage / Kristan Hanson6-3, 7-6
2025-06-08vs SD 3.5WE Mtn View/ SaenzWon 10
W#2 DoublesYvonne Bentle / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Brenda Henriquez / Elizabeth Ponce6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCaree Lesh / Sue Taylor vs Suzanne Pham / Clara Tan3-6, 3-6
2025-05-18vs SoCal/Nguyen/18&Over3.5FLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jessica Balli vs Christine Pham / Sarah Dudley3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesJessica Balli / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Almira MacIas / Amy Rorstad6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSue Taylor vs Caitlin Frazer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-27vs SD 3.5WE Mtn View/ SaenzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeagan McKissick / Sue Taylor vs Lilyan Ruiz / Valeria Perez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Dahlgren vs Dania Michelle Castillo2-6, 1-6
2025-04-13vs SD 3.5WE SDTRC/ AdamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesNabeelah Khan / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Kelly Wilson / Erica Meyer5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Jessica Balli
published
3.21
Yvonne Bentle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Meagan McKissick
published
3.15
Sue Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Erika Temple
published 3.5
3.10
Caree Lesh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Jennifer Vernallis
published
3.04
Nabeelah Khan
published
2.94
Samantha Nelson
published
2.83
Jennifer Neivert
published
2.64
Michelle Gilmore
published
Linda Gayhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caree Lesh + Elizabeth Dahlgren9453% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jessica Balli
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Yvonne Bentle
80W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Meagan McKissick
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Sue Taylor
55W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Erika Temple
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Caree Lesh
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Vernallis
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Nabeelah Khan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Samantha Nelson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
Jennifer Neivert
9W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Michelle Gilmore
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Linda Gayhart
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.