Teams

Vilardo/18s/2.5/NC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmma Clark / Luis Angel Perez Roman vs Steven Hart / Paige Butler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristin Vilardo / Luis Angel Perez Roman vs Paige Butler / Alexander Mata Iv7-6, 6-4
2026-06-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristin Vilardo / Luis Angel Perez Roman vs Alexander Mata Iv / Elizabeth Klocek6-3, 6-4
2026-06-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesMelissa Lama / Luis Angel Perez Roman vs Eric Tagesen / Lauren Tagesen6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Cov Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Vilardo/18s/2.5/NC6115617180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Connor Seale
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 2.5
2.49
Elaina Frey
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 2.5
2.40
Christin Vilardo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
2.18
Alayna Chelette
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Jeramie Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Luis Angel Perez Roman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lynette Lobell
usually #3 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Matthew Lemons
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Matthew Salas
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Melissa Lama
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Lobell + Melissa Lama0721% gamesnot enough data
Christin Vilardo + Melissa Lama1429% gamesnot enough data
Lynette Lobell + Christin Vilardo224 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Salas + Elaina Frey224 matchesnot enough data
Christin Vilardo + Luis Angel Perez Roman213 matchesnot enough data
Christin Vilardo + Connor Seale123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Connor Seale
11W–12L career · type S · 19 lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
2.5
Elaina Frey
15W–17L career · 19 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Christin Vilardo
21W–31L career · 29 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Alayna Chelette
5W–13L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Jeramie Wright
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Angel Perez Roman
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynette Lobell
10W–22L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Lemons
3W–11L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Salas
7W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Lama
5W–25L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.