Teams

YMCA Firecrackers

2024 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 4.0 W Thursday

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-02-22vs ShavettesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Lake / Victoria van Zile vs Tina OBryan / Diana Rendon6-3, 6-1
2024-02-14vs Fabulous FriendsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Foster / Victoria van Zile vs Zdenka Edgar / Chaney Stuart6-2, 6-3
2024-02-08vs Team X Formerly ScogginsWon 10
W#2 DoublesTammy Foster / Victoria van Zile vs Jill Briggs / Melissa Bynum6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Denise Horan
published 4
3.93
Allyson McCale
published 4
3.80
Silvia Suputra
published
3.75
Cheryl Adams
published 4
Christina Li
published 4
Victoria van Zile
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Tiffany May
published
3.74
Terrilee Tatum
published
3.70
Angela Penrod
published 4
3.68
Fernanda Aguilar
published
3.60
Candice Hitt
published 4
3.56
Martha Bartlett
published
3.34
Michiko Callanan
published
3.22
Lynn Platteborze
published
Jackie Delnano
published
Jolene Moore
published
Tammy Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Penrod + Fernanda Aguilar2945% games+0.4% vs expected
Lynn Platteborze + Michiko Callanan134 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Platteborze + Silvia Suputra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Horan
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Allyson McCale
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
Silvia Suputra
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Cheryl Adams
33W–34L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Christina Li
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Victoria van Zile
75W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tiffany May
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Terrilee Tatum
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Angela Penrod
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.70
Fernanda Aguilar
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Candice Hitt
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Martha Bartlett
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Michiko Callanan
12W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Lynn Platteborze
20W–60L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Jackie Delnano
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jolene Moore
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tammy Foster
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.