Teams

CTL18/Hunter/CTFC

Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo Men - 8.5

19 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Cayce Tennis and Fitness Center
2026-08-25vs CTL18/KITOWICZ/WRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLane Hinson / Dargan Gore vs David Collins / Scott Saunders6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Timothy Hamrick vs Roc Swindler / Michael Barker6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteven Junis / Joshua Estes vs Joseph Kitowicz / Stephen Anderson6-4, 6-1
2026-08-18vs CTL18/Rodgers/CTFCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSean Nguyen / Lane Small vs Eric Jackson / Jack Woods6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLane Hinson / Cory Muncill vs Drew Casper / Kevin Felkel6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKyle Edwards / Timothy Hamrick vs Andrew Hershelman / Matthew Stein6-7, 2-6
2026-08-04vs CTL18/KITOWICZ/WRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyle Edwards / Elliot Turner vs David Collins / Michael Barker3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCorey Garrity / Joshua Estes vs Christopher Eaker / GYLES GREGORY6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBoone Walker / Palmer Keenan vs Tyler Tracy / Ramkumar Jayagopalan6-3, 6-2
2026-07-28vs CTL18/Rodgers/CTFCLost 12
W#1 DoublesSean Nguyen / Lane Small vs Josey Iliff / Jenkins Mann6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteven Junis / Daniel Goolsby vs Andrew Hershelman / Matthew Stein4-6, 1-2
L#3 DoublesCharles Webb / Palmer Keenan vs Drew Casper / Kevin Felkel4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-14vs CTL18/KITOWICZ/WRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSteven Junis / Daniel Goolsby vs Michael Barker / Eric Feuerstein6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCharles Webb / Dawson Thornton vs Craig Tyson / Chris Collins6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndrew Wescott / Elliot Turner vs GYLES GREGORY / Joseph Kitowicz7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 18 & Over Combo Men - 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL18/Rodgers/CTFC3193785
2CTL18/Hunter/CTFC2163672
3CTL18/KITOWICZ/WRC030918110

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Lane Hinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.61
Sean Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.39
Jordan Hunter
published
4.37
Charles Webb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.37
Corey Garrity
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Andrew Wescott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Boone Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Kyle Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Joseph Roche Sr
published
3.96
Palmer Keenan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Timothy Hamrick
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Daniel Goolsby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Elliot Turner
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.78
Dawson Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Lane Small
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Joshua Estes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Dargan Gore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Cory Muncill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Wil Brown
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dargan Gore + Lane Small7069% games+17.1% vs expected
Elliot Turner + Lane Small7060% games+2.1% vs expected
Boone Walker + Charles Webb6262% gamesnot enough data
Elliot Turner + Dargan Gore3256% gamesnot enough data
Sean Nguyen + Lane Small314 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Hunter + Kyle Edwards314 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Roche Sr + Boone Walker303 matchesnot enough data
Sean Nguyen + Dargan Gore123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lane Hinson
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.78
Sean Nguyen
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
Jordan Hunter
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Charles Webb
47W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Corey Garrity
4W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Andrew Wescott
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Boone Walker
59W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Kyle Edwards
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
Joseph Roche Sr
24W–16L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Palmer Keenan
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Timothy Hamrick
44W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Daniel Goolsby
39W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Elliot Turner
93W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Dawson Thornton
101W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Lane Small
83W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.76
Joshua Estes
27W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Dargan Gore
58W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Cory Muncill
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
Wil Brown
12W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.