Teams

Walters, Eric

2026 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Men 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-17vs Coins, JimmieLost 02
L#1 DoublesRussell Young / Jerry Sloan vs William Ellis / Joseph McCray5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRandy Lominick / Bruce Case vs Stanley Rattler / Larry Christian5-7, 1-6
2026-08-10vs Merchant, TomLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Holston / Chad Feldman vs Darryl Barnes / Louis Saddler3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJerry Sloan / Russell Young vs Stan Fisher / Dwayne Chisolm6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEric Walters / Bruce Case vs Stanley Jenkins / Steven Patterson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-27vs Smith, NathanLost 12
W#1 DoublesJerry Sloan / Feng Zhang vs Warren Biddle / Kevin Rundlett6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBruce Case / Chad Feldman vs Nathan Smith / Mark Bradshaw2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRandy Lominick / Russell Young vs Seth Thompson / Kurt Black7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith, Nathan123614100
2Brown, Patrick02061273
3Walters, Eric03181699

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Bruce Case
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Danny Lynch
published 3.5
3.15
Stephen Holston
published
3.10
Scott Holston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
2.74
Jerry Sloan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Chad Feldman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Randy Lominick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Feng Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Johnny White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Holston + Stephen Holston314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bruce Case
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Danny Lynch
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Stephen Holston
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
Scott Holston
22W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Marcello Gambino Meriles
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Jerry Sloan
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Chad Feldman
3W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Randy Lominick
5W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.34
Feng Zhang
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Johnny White
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.