Teams

KNO NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTrevor Wetterling vs Greg Johnson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-23vs EM REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Muller / Mark Thompson vs Brent Bowman / David Steimel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTrevor Wetterling vs David Ekedahl1-6, 1-6
2023-05-16vs SS-H GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEric Muller / Kevin Parnell vs Ankit Prasad / John Astle2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTrevor Wetterling / Mike Wolf vs John Holtz / Lawrence Grylack6-2, 6-1
2023-05-09vs HRCA-N GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesTrevor Wetterling vs Trevor David3-6, 2-6
2023-05-02vs PRC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJason Edwards / Eric Muller vs Ryan Menachof / TJ VanderHeiden6-2, 6-3
2023-04-25vs HV BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesTrevor Wetterling / Eric Muller vs Mark Figley / NATE KRULISH0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Richard Harris
published
3.31
Eric Muller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Trevor Wetterling
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Jason Edwards
published
3.23
Mike Bradley
published
3.21
Mark Thompson
published
3.20
Kyle Conn
published
3.02
Ryan Page
published
James Espey
published
Kevin Parnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Muller + Kyle Conn3349% games−0.2% vs expected
Mike Bradley + Richard Harris1449% games−7.3% vs expected
Eric Muller + Jason Edwards033 matchesnot enough data
Jason Edwards + Kyle Conn303 matchesnot enough data
Jason Edwards + Mark Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Conn + Mike Bradley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Harris
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Eric Muller
26W–48L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Trevor Wetterling
25W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Jason Edwards
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Mike Bradley
10W–23L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Mark Thompson
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Kyle Conn
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Ryan Page
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
James Espey
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Parnell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.