Teams

TbarM Girlfriends

2024 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKDAY WOMEN · 4.0 Women Monday

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Kim Williford
published
3.86
Victoria Nanos
published
3.76
Susie Zampas
published
3.75
Cheryl Adams
published 4
Casey Herridge
published 4
3.71
Julie Brooke
published
3.67
Suzanna Harrison
published
3.65
Lynne Dawson
published
3.58
Tracy Brooke
published
3.58
Tammie Thompson
published
3.53
Laura Rice
published
3.51
Eloise Zatopek
published
3.48
Melissa Rimmelin
published
3.38
Terry Holcomb
published
Debbie Grieder
published 3.5
3.10
Karen Truesdell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Rimmelin + Laura Rice224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Brooke + Cheryl Adams303 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Brooke + Laura Rice123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Williford
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Victoria Nanos
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
Susie Zampas
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Cheryl Adams
33W–34L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Casey Herridge
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Brooke
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Suzanna Harrison
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Lynne Dawson
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Tracy Brooke
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
Tammie Thompson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Laura Rice
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Eloise Zatopek
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
Melissa Rimmelin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Terry Holcomb
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Debbie Grieder
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Truesdell
2W–38L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.