Teams

Holsinger, Trevor

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-05vs Hanover, ScottLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenneth Havens / Jason Schroeder vs R Scott Hanover / Daniel Miskowic1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStanley Bowling / Malcolm Atherton vs Andrew Hall / Daniel Knox5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJim Dauer / AMIR MOHAMMED vs Vick Singh / Anthony Seim3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jason Schroeder
published
3.76
Tim Lair
published
3.70
Brad Cook
published 4
3.68
Jim Dauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Kevin Boehringer
published
3.67
Trevor Holsinger
published
3.67
AMIR MOHAMMED
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.67
Kevin Harlan
published
3.65
Doug Schwabauer
published
3.63
Malcolm Atherton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Kenneth Havens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Stanley Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shawn Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Schwabauer + Trevor Holsinger3352% games+6.6% vs expected
Trevor Holsinger + Kevin Harlan6156% games+5.4% vs expected
Doug Schwabauer + Kevin Harlan7356% games+4.1% vs expected
Doug Schwabauer + Tim Lair4258% games+1.8% vs expected
Kenneth Havens + Kevin Harlan6349% games−0.0% vs expected
Stanley Bowling + Kevin Harlan2646% games−4.6% vs expected
Kenneth Havens + Trevor Holsinger7548% games−6.0% vs expected
Stanley Bowling + Jim Dauer224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Schroeder
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Tim Lair
26W–21L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Brad Cook
40W–41L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Jim Dauer
25W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kevin Boehringer
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Trevor Holsinger
56W–36L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4.5
AMIR MOHAMMED
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.67
Kevin Harlan
43W–38L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Doug Schwabauer
42W–48L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Malcolm Atherton
21W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Kenneth Havens
35W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Stanley Bowling
20W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Shawn Perkins
13W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.