Teams

Ga.Jimenez40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-30Lost 02
L#1 SinglesGabe Jimenez vs Jason Tuttle2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Jonathan Jenkins3-6, 4-6
2026-07-22vs Da.Breazeale40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesAllen Oliver vs J Barnes Stephenson2-6, 0-6
2026-07-17vs La.Brock40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrian Rigney vs Ben Thompson0-2
L#3 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Lawrence Brock1-6, 0-6
2026-07-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesCharles Gowland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-01vs Da.Breazeale40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesGabe Jimenez vs Jason Grunberg1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Will Johnson1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAllen Oliver vs Brian Hardwick3-6, 4-6
2026-06-24vs Is.Pataki40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAllen Oliver vs Matthew Richman1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesBrian Rigney vs Ken Glanville6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-17vs La.Brock40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesGabe Jimenez vs Jonathan Jenkins4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Jason Tuttle2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCharles Gowland vs Graham Schillmoller1-6, 1-6
2026-06-10vs Da.Breazeale40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Robert Whitehurst2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesGabe Jimenez vs J Barnes Stephenson5-7, 5-4
2026-06-03vs Is.Pataki40SLost 03
L#1 SinglesGabe Jimenez vs Matthew Richman0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Sam Osman6-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAllen Oliver vs Geoff Knight3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Brock40S8123412165
2Is.Pataki40S54131432234
3Da.Breazeale40S45131431241
4Ga.Jimenez40S1852246287

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
David Rowe
published 4
3.72
Brian Rigney
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.66
Charles Gowland
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.61
Gabe Jimenez
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.54
Ted Lotchin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.36
Allen Oliver
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.14
Ben Barnhill
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabe Jimenez + Ted Lotchin6649% gamesnot enough data
Gabe Jimenez + Charles Gowland2543% gamesnot enough data
Ted Lotchin + Charles Gowland224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Rowe
6W–13L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Brian Rigney
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Charles Gowland
44W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Gabe Jimenez
65W–104L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Ted Lotchin
159W–115L career · 6 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Allen Oliver
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.36
3.5
Ben Barnhill
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.