Teams

Wimberly - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-15vs Tan - SHLLost 03
L#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Jacqueline Wallace vs Kathleen Galinis / Christy Tillar2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmelia Gandy vs Stacey Martin4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Sally Bergosh vs Maureen Proctor / Patricia Leahy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-04-14vs McElhany - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Anna Kreis vs Jennifer Capozzoli / Jena Wise3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmelia Gandy / Janet Olliff vs Tanya Hughes / Jeannette Fabbro6-3, 6-3
2025-04-14vs Tan - SHLLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / Amelia Gandy vs Dodi Stringfellow / Tonya Pfeifle1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMecy Wimberly vs Cherie Tan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs McElhany - PCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Amelia Gandy vs Jena Wise / Jeannette Fabbro4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Barbara French vs Natalie Mcelhany / Lauren Anderson3-6, 3-6
2025-03-29vs Essex - SHLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Ann Scott vs Dana Persons / Carolyn Bosworth4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmelia Gandy / Kris Pritchard vs Kim Gall / Peggy van Sleen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-27vs Bryan - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Jacqueline Wallace vs Emily Mattes / Mary Bryan5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmelia Gandy vs Rhonda Springer6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMecy Wimberly / Ann Scott vs Van Hughes / Gail Tully4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Amelia Gandy
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
3.26
Bonnie Bucco
published 3.5
Ann Scott
published 3.5
3.25
Mecy Wimberly
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Jacqueline Wallace
published
3.11
Susan Bonsignore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Sally Bergosh
published
2.65
Barbara French
published 3
Kris Pritchard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amelia Gandy + Mecy Wimberly5158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amelia Gandy
77W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Bonnie Bucco
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Ann Scott
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Jacqueline Wallace
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Barbara French
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Kris Pritchard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.