Teams

WParker (Queens)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-10vs JGardiner (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMaggie Lawrence vs Amanda Meloni2-6, 3-6
2022-05-03vs CStaton (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLaine Parker Horvath / Lina Clarke vs Christine Richards / Janna Huggins6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMaggie Lawrence vs Hannah Chillag2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-19vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLina Clarke / Sara Thompson vs Debbie Titlestad / Tasha Sheehy6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Liz Barton6-0, 6-0
2022-04-18vs JGardiner (OPRC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesLina Clarke / Jennifer Ko vs Kristen Montgomery / Eryn Ratcliffe6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Carolyn Drake6-2, 6-3
2022-04-12vs AKaiser (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLina Clarke / Sara Thompson vs Jordan Bowers / Colleen Cook7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMaggie Lawrence vs Cameron Green6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Alexandra Udell6-1, 6-1
2022-03-19vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Split 11
W#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Lindsay Morrison6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLina Clarke / Maggie Lawrence vs Laura Grigoleit / Mollie Lynch6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-01vs AKaiser (Queens)Won 30
W#1 SinglesLaine Parker Horvath vs Alexandra Udell6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMaggie Lawrence vs Marie McDaniel6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLina Clarke / Sara Thompson vs Tessa Radziej / Cecilia Drake6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Laura Alvarez
published
4.67
Brittney Desmond
published 5
4.45
Maggie Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.43
4.34
Lina Clarke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Laine Parker Horvath
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
4.15
Darri Thayaprasat
published 4.5
4.11
Mary Beth Huffman
published
3.90
Julie Busha
published
Wendy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Lawrence + Lina Clarke2450% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Alvarez
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.71
5
Brittney Desmond
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.67
4.5
Maggie Lawrence
153W–102L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
4.45
5
Carson Rose Tennyson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
4.43
4.5
Lina Clarke
67W–47L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
Laine Parker Horvath
50W–35L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Darri Thayaprasat
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.15
Mary Beth Huffman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Julie Busha
35W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Wendy Parker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.