Teams

OC T-Rex Swings - CMTC -Lee/Kim Sat9

2024 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Meng-Chieh Lee
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.04
Hye Jin Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.91
Mikayla Riggs
published
3.70
Julie Mak
published
3.70
Susie Kim
published
3.59
Katherine Sexton
published
3.36
Karla Padova
published
3.29
Sandra Patel
published
3.21
Leslie Le
published
3.17
Christina Case
published 3.5
3.05
Lailai Ho
published
3.02
Jin Ge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hye Jin Robertson + Meng-Chieh Lee12462% games+1.8% vs expected
Christina Case + Sandra Patel61144% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Meng-Chieh Lee
136W–50L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Hye Jin Robertson
160W–80L career · 8 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
Mikayla Riggs
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.91
Julie Mak
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Susie Kim
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Katherine Sexton
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Karla Padova
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
Sandra Patel
13W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
Leslie Le
22W–38L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Christina Case
11W–26L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Lailai Ho
16W–25L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
Jin Ge
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.