Teams

Isleworth-Sheffield

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE TriLevel 18 & Over SUMMER Night · 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-28vs USTA Campus-Zogheib-Team ZLost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Herrig / Akinyemi Ajayi vs Prakriti Das / Sal Nathu4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKevin Herrig / Chris Zaworski vs Andy Chan / Tommy Vo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-07vs USTA Campus-Zogheib-Team ZWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Herrig / Chris Zaworski vs Sal Nathu / Prakriti Das6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesPaul Bellingham / Kevin Herrig vs Gowtham Shanmugam / Raul Larrousse6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-16vs USTA Campus-Zogheib-Team ZWon 21
W#1 DoublesAkinyemi Ajayi / Paul Bellingham vs Pradeep Krishnamurthy / Zack Brasher6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlberto Mansilla / Craig Curtis vs Juan Camilo Ramirez / Joseph Parris3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Rifenberg / Jay Stewart vs Moe Zogheib / James Sheedy6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Chris Zaworski
published 4
3.63
Kevin Herrig
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Akinyemi Ajayi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Craig Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Alberto Mansilla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Javiel Quesada
published
3.02
Stephen Horn
published
2.75
Jay Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Pappalardo
published
John Rifenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ken Garcia
published
Paul Bellingham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rasesh Thakkar
published
Ross Reiter
published
Wayne Sheffield
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Zaworski
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.91
Kevin Herrig
32W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Akinyemi Ajayi
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Craig Curtis
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Alberto Mansilla
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Javiel Quesada
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
Stephen Horn
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jay Stewart
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Joe Pappalardo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Rifenberg
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ken Garcia
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Bellingham
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rasesh Thakkar
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Reiter
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Sheffield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.