Teams

WESS-Moran 18s 2.5M

2026 bSEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT MEN · 2.5 MEN MON PM SEM

2 players · average NTRP 2.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-13vs HAWK-BARTA 18s 2.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Lignell / Rick Velez vs Mukund Viswanathan / Jarrod Kassuba1-6, 4-6
2026-07-06Won 20
W#1 DoublesKevin Lignell / Rick Velez vs Daniel Newton / Joseph Jacobs6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHugo Moran vs Larry Lambrecht6-2, 6-4
2026-06-29vs BT-Chattahi 18s 2.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesHugo Moran / Suraj Gavande vs Joseph Chattahi / Konark Vani3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-22vs HAWK-BARTA 18s 2.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesHugo Moran / Eric Tye vs Jarrod Kassuba / Mark Montri4-6, 4-6
2026-06-15vs EAST-Wonderly 18s 2.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesEric Tye / Hugo Moran vs Patrick Meikle / Deshawn Smith3-6, 4-6
2026-06-08vs BT-Chattahi 18s 2.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Tye / Hugo Moran vs Joseph Chattahi / Adewunmi Adeyemo6-2, 6-2
2026-06-01vs HAWK-BARTA 18s 2.5MWon 10
W#2 DoublesGeorge Nijem / Hugo Moran vs Rutwick Garude / Nathaniel Kothbauer6-4, 6-4
2026-05-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesHugo Moran vs Larry Lambrecht6-4, 7-5
2026-05-11vs BT-Chattahi 18s 2.5MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHugo Moran / Robert Black vs Joseph Chattahi / Konark Vani6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRick Velez / Dennis Houston vs Fawaz Haddad / Bashar Okka6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 MEN MON PM SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HAWK-BARTA 18s 2.5M54161127237
2BT-Chattahi 18s 2.5M54161127239
3WESS-Moran 18s 2.5M54141327225
4EAST-Wonderly 18s 2.5M3681940285

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Hugo Moran
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.26
Rick Velez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Hugo Moran
35W–65L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.44
Rick Velez
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.