Teams

Bake - Team Munn

2025 Adult 55 & Over - Bakersfield · 7.0 Women - Bake

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-02vs Bak0 - LLW - Poach PerfectSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJeannie Munn / Luann Shults vs Rebecca Badgett / Rhonda Slegers3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDenise Duquette / Susan Frakes vs Michelle Pisano / Marri Tillema6-2, 6-3
2025-02-23vs Bak0 - LLW - Poach PerfectLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeannie Munn / Ronel Rabe vs Rebecca Badgett / Sandra Gamboa6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Coughlin / Lori McQuilliams vs Rhonda Slegers / Agnes DeJong6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDawn Rhodes / Imelda Ceja-Butkiewicz vs KIMBERLY PFISTER / Terry Echeverria6-7, 2-6
2025-02-02vs Bak0 - LLW - Poach PerfectWon 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Duquette / Susan Frakes vs Linette Holliday / Amy Meger6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-01-12vs Bak0 - LLW - Poach PerfectWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Frakes / Luann Shults vs Cara Williams / Cindy Goodmon6-4, 6-2
2025-01-05vs Bak0 - LLW - Poach PerfectWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Frakes / Denise Duquette vs KIMBERLY PFISTER / Minda Owens6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Denise Duquette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Susan Frakes
published
Dawn Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Kori Harrison
published
3.09
Colleen Paulden
published 3.5
3.06
Leah Coughlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Lori McQuilliams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jeannie Munn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Luann Shults
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Cindy Seibly
published 3
2.74
Rachel Friesen
published
Imelda Ceja-Butkiewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ronel Rabe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Duquette
37W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Susan Frakes
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Dawn Rhodes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kori Harrison
19W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Colleen Paulden
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Leah Coughlin
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Lori McQuilliams
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jeannie Munn
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Luann Shults
37W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Cindy Seibly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Rachel Friesen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Imelda Ceja-Butkiewicz
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ronel Rabe
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.