Teams

Ka.Hedgepeth40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-24vs Ju.Brown40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Hackman / Kristen Rauth vs Ashley McCollum / Juli Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Beth Rea vs Sharyn Leaver / Laura Panebianco4-6, 0-6
2024-09-12vs Ba.Wilhelm40CWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbra Wait / Jodi Haire vs Patricia Galloway / Anne Redmond4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCristine Allison / Shannon Fuller vs Sabrina Hass / Tina Goertz6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCasey Rainey / Kathryn Nani vs Barbara Wilhelm / Courtney Carey6-2, 6-3
2024-09-05vs Ca.Beaird40CSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBecky Campbell / Kathryn Nani vs Rachel Pisciotta / Lee Anne Oxford2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBarbra Wait / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Mary Asbill / Mary Jo Cramer6-1, 6-2
2024-08-29vs Ma.Hellner40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa McDermott / Cristine Allison vs Kimberly McLellan / Carolyn Elliott4-6, 2-6
2024-08-22vs Tr.Crabtree40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesCristine Allison / Aparna Vanguri vs Amy Gillespie / Lauren Redmond4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Rea / Barbra Wait vs Liz Arcos / Catherine Taylor0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJodi Haire / Becky Campbell vs Ana Maria Allessi / Jocelyn Badulis2-6, 1-6
2024-08-15vs St.Grose40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesCristine Allison / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Laura Cox / Jennifer Troch3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Campbell / Casey Rainey vs Carrie Struble / Stacy Grose6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBarbra Wait / Kathryn Nani vs Peggy Williams / LaDonna Lee6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Susan Hackman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Lisa McDermott
published
2.78
Cristine Allison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Aparna Vanguri
published 3
2.77
Barbra Wait
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Casey Rainey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Debra Vaughn
published 3
2.62
Kristen Rauth
published
2.61
Kathryn Nani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Jodi Haire
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Nani + Casey Rainey7549% games+0.9% vs expected
Cristine Allison + Barbra Wait31036% games−1.8% vs expected
Lee Berrios-Smothers + Barbra Wait3840% gamesnot enough data
Susan Hackman + Kathryn Nani3349% gamesnot enough data
Cristine Allison + Lee Berrios-Smothers224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Berrios-Smothers + Casey Rainey044 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hackman + Cristine Allison213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hackman + Lee Berrios-Smothers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susan Hackman
89W–129L career · 1 line in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–107L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
Lisa McDermott
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Cristine Allison
62W–127L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Aparna Vanguri
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Barbra Wait
63W–140L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Casey Rainey
31W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Debra Vaughn
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63
Kristen Rauth
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Kathryn Nani
55W–93L career · 6 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
Jodi Haire
11W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.