Teams

FYC - Morreale

2026 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 6.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-16vs Glen Kernan - RawlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Kathleen Muldoon / Lauren Griffith vs Amber Kenney / Christi Bisson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTammy Morreale / Elizabeth Rice vs Danijela Pope / Gina Stakem6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKatie Culp / Sara Bertoch vs Lois Robichaud / Cheryl Matthews2-6, 6-4
2026-06-09vs Sawgrass - RendzioWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Morreale / Elizabeth Rice vs Lorrayne Carless / Melissa Knarr7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Bertoch / Ashley Brockman vs Lindsay Long / Stacey Mayer2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKatie Culp / Cecilia House vs Susan Conlin / Gretchen Bates6-2, 6-0
2026-05-26vs Yards - NoonanWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Clontz / Ashli Nixon vs Renee Callahan / Narong Khan6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Helmick / Tammy Morreale vs Beth McCann / Loretta Noonan4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesClaire Do / Susan Vansandt vs Monica Barrett / Susan Marie Thornton HOLLIDAY6-2, 6-2
2026-05-19vs Planet Swim - HenleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Kathleen Muldoon / Renee' Kirkland vs Sarah Merritt / Shelly Turner7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTammy Morreale / Katrina Torres vs Tory Eulenfeld / Karen Papaleo6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKatie Culp / Nancy Simmons vs Tabitha Morse / Marissa Alex3-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs Palencia - LindroosWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatrina Torres / Elizabeth Smith vs Doana Guerrero / Cristin Lindroos6-3, 6-2
2026-04-21vs Rivertown - CaballeroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRenee' Kirkland / Ashley Brockman vs Susan Astary / Natalia Mendoza6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Smith / Ashli Nixon vs Sheila Caballero / Yadira Russell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-14vs Southside - AtkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Helmick / Tammy Morreale vs Michelle Kalil / Caroline Morris0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAshley Brockman / Renee' Kirkland vs Polly Curole / Jennifer Stokes2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Clontz / Nancy Simmons vs Wendy Ashby / Julie Hoffman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Mary Kathleen Muldoon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Katie Culp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Kim Clontz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Tammy Morreale
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Ashley Brockman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Elizabeth Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Nancy Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Renee' Kirkland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Lauren Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Ashli Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Elizabeth Rice
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Katrina Torres
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Ashley Helmick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Cecilia House
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Claire Do
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Phoebe Kashmanian
published
2.46
Sara Bertoch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Vansandt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Morreale + Elizabeth Rice5158% gamesnot enough data
Tammy Morreale + Katie Culp404 matchesnot enough data
Sara Bertoch + Elizabeth Rice314 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Brockman + Renee' Kirkland123 matchesnot enough data
Renee' Kirkland + Mary Kathleen Muldoon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Kathleen Muldoon
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Katie Culp
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Kim Clontz
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Tammy Morreale
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Ashley Brockman
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
Elizabeth Smith
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Nancy Simmons
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Renee' Kirkland
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Lauren Griffith
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Ashli Nixon
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Elizabeth Rice
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Katrina Torres
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ashley Helmick
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Cecilia House
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Claire Do
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Phoebe Kashmanian
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Sara Bertoch
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.46
Susan Vansandt
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.