← Teams

Jo.Allessio55S

2026 Capital Singles 55 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-19vs Ma.Morriston55SWon 2–1
L#1 SinglesAdam Weyne vs David Mize1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJoseph Roney vs John van Ness6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesJohn Allessio vs Alberto Pajarilla6-0, 3-0
2026-07-12vs Ma.Morriston55SWon 2–1
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Miller vs John van Ness6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJoseph Roney vs David Mize0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesHarold Rabinovitz vs Mike King6-3, 6-3
2026-07-05vs Ma.Morriston55SWon 2–1
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Miller vs John van Ness6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHarold Rabinovitz vs Scott Thurston6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesDavid Richey vs Alberto Pajarilla1-6, 1-6
2026-07-01vs Ma.Morriston55SWon 3–0
W#1 SinglesAdam Weyne vs Scott Thurston6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Miller vs THOMAS SIBRIZZI6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHarold Rabinovitz vs Daniel Wascher6-1, 6-0
2026-06-14vs Ma.Morriston55SSplit 1–1
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Miller vs Daniel Wascher6-4, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAnthony Milligan vs Scott Thurston2-6, 2-6
2026-06-07vs Ma.Morriston55SWon 2–1
W#1 SinglesJohn Allessio vs Marc Morriston6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJoseph Roney vs Mike King6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAnthony Milligan vs THOMAS SIBRIZZI2-6, 2-6
2026-05-31vs Ma.Morriston55SLost 1–2
L#1 SinglesAdam Weyne vs John van Ness4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Allessio vs David Mize5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJoseph Roney vs Mike King2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Harold Rabinovitz
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published —
2.92
Jeffrey Miller
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published —
2.89
Joseph Roney
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 29% · published —
2.80
John Allessio
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Adam Weyne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.01
David Richey
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
—
Anthony Milligan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Allessio + Adam Weyne1–23 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
Harold Rabinovitz
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
—
Jeffrey Miller
18W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
—
Joseph Roney
7W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
John Allessio
59W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Adam Weyne
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
David Richey
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
—
Anthony Milligan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.