Teams

Eagle Gals

2022 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.85 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-06-29vs Over ServedLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Mangum / Julienne Ferguson vs Ashley Tribble / Beth Lassen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristin Lund vs Joanne Cornwell7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPatricia Gastanaga / Morgan Leavitt vs Lisa Vargason / Margot Gilna7-6, 6-1
2022-06-28vs Sets and the CityLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin Lund / Karen Mangum vs Susan Schossberger / Jeanna Rice6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Anya Sandusky6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-22vs Ladytennisty 18Split 11
W#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Emily Flores1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Jo Roby2-6, 4-6
2022-06-20vs ACE KICKERSWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnna Willcuts vs Tory Goltry6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDawn Crochet / Julienne Ferguson vs Terri Schwanz / Elba Massena6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Eileen Ursillo6-3, 6-0
2022-06-15vs PTSALost 03
L#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Kayce McEwan4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaQuel Montgomery / Katheryn Burriesci vs Tina Taylor / Beth Calvo4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Katherine Johnson4-6, 1-6
2022-06-13vs LOOSE STRINGSSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnna Willcuts vs Dawn Coder1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRaQuel Montgomery / Julienne Ferguson vs Nancy Baskin / Angela Larsen6-1, 7-6
2022-06-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnna Willcuts vs Teresa McDonald6-1, 6-3
2022-06-06vs Each Hit 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Lund / Karen Mangum vs Shelley Hunter / Donalee Quinn6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Katie Laws6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulienne Ferguson / Patricia Gastanaga vs Aubrey Thomas / Courtney Sticka6-1, 6-2
2022-06-01vs HillcrestWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Mallory / Anna Willcuts vs Tina Michael / Becky Gordon6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKaren Mangum / Julienne Ferguson vs Shawna Ianson / Kimberly Shansby6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Hillary Lilya7-5, 6-4
2022-05-25vs TerminettersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMorgan Leavitt / Patricia Gastanaga vs Jane Perlaky / Jennifer Mitchell6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Willcuts vs Kiley Holt6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKristin Lund vs Christine Cegelski7-6, 7-6
2022-05-23vs Stronger TogetherSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMorgan Leavitt vs Halle Alexander6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJulienne Ferguson / Kristin Lund vs Paula Lawson / Erin Peterson3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Willcuts
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Erin Salisbury
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published 4
3.73
Kimberly Cowley
published 4
3.59
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.59
3.53
Karen Mangum
published 4
3.42
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.35
Kristina Kingery
published 3.5
3.30
Nancy Mallory
published 3.5
3.19
Shannon Lofton
published
Julienne Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Kristin Lund
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Lori van Alfen
published
Morgan Leavitt
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
RaQuel Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katheryn Burriesci + Kimberly Cowley7650% games+9.1% vs expected
Dawn Crochet + Christine Elwer5549% games+1.9% vs expected
Nancy Mallory + Katheryn Burriesci6450% games+0.5% vs expected
Christine Elwer + Katheryn Burriesci15458% games−0.2% vs expected
Kimberly Cowley + Lori van Alfen503254% gamesnot enough data
Julienne Ferguson + Karen Mangum121252% gamesnot enough data
Katheryn Burriesci + RaQuel Montgomery101252% gamesnot enough data
Katheryn Burriesci + Lori van Alfen12456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Willcuts
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Erin Salisbury
4W–16L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Patricia Gastanaga
71W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kimberly Cowley
140W–95L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
4
Katheryn Burriesci
108W–95L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Karen Mangum
72W–60L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Dawn Crochet
170W–181L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Kristina Kingery
54W–65L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Nancy Mallory
189W–137L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Shannon Lofton
34W–38L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Julienne Ferguson
42W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Lund
26W–41L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori van Alfen
51W–35L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Morgan Leavitt
15W–15L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
RaQuel Montgomery
44W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.