Teams

J.Diamond

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs F.AllisonWon 20
W#2 DoublesKen Nowell / Scott Anderson vs Larry Essary / John Dunn6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKen Lawton / Tom Sparks vs David McNeill / David Boyce6-3, 6-4
2023-05-03vs L.BrockSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTom Sparks / Ken Lawton vs Preston Waldo / Kenneth Krause6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKen Nowell / Jeff Smith vs Lawrence Brock / Graham Schillmoller7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-19vs J.Jones 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesKen Nowell / Scott Anderson vs Patrick Wood / Joe Murphy6-2, 6-1
2023-04-12vs T.SherburneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Ted Sherburne / Morgan Camp6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKen Lawton / Steven Miller vs Scott St John / Paul Holscher7-5, 6-2
2023-04-05vs T.SherburneLost 02
L#2 DoublesKen Lawton / Tom Sparks vs Jonathan Adams / Paul Holscher5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Ted Sherburne / Scott St John2-6, 3-6
2023-03-29vs R.Hatlen 40+Won 20
W#2 DoublesKen Lawton / Tom Sparks vs Damien Graham / Kevin Tombs6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs James McCown / John Whalen7-6, 6-0
2023-03-22vs F.SUN/SHUEYWon 20
W#2 DoublesKen Lawton / Tom Sparks vs Spence Huffstetler / Mark Wood6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Francis Sun / David Clark6-2, 6-4
2023-03-08vs L.BrockWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn Diamond / Ken Nowell vs Preston Waldo / Jonathan Jenkins3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKen Lawton / Tom Sparks vs John Peterson / Kenneth Krause6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
John Diamond
published
3.82
Ken Lawton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.79
Tony Stewart
published
3.76
Ken Nowell
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Scott Riley
published
3.63
Hai Le
published
3.42
Ken Glanville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Diamond + Ken Nowell6166% games+3.0% vs expected
Ken Lawton + Ken Nowell10753% games−8.7% vs expected
John Diamond + Scott Riley404 matchesnot enough data
Scott Riley + Ken Lawton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Diamond
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Ken Lawton
95W–65L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Tony Stewart
14W–24L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Ken Nowell
211W–146L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Scott Riley
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Hai Le
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Ken Glanville
18W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.