Teams

Yadkin/Ehrig/Morgan/18+8.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 8.5 - Thursday Night

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-25vs Yadkin/Gregory/18+/8.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Cobb / Emily McMillen vs Cari Powell / Kate Meiners7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMolly Ehrig / Sally Eagleton vs Allison Johnson / Whitney Ellis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Hinshelwood / Kimberly Busse vs Jayne Johnston / Martha Benbow6-3, 6-4
2025-09-04vs Yadkin/Gregory/18+/8.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Cobb / Kimberly Busse vs Loni Worsley / Cari Powell1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Rackley / Molly Ehrig vs Lauren Ivey / Jayne Johnston6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKerri Morgan / Susanna Ringeman vs Sarah Cline / Catherine Tanner7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-28vs Yadkin/Gregory/18+/8.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSally Eagleton / Kimberly Busse vs Kate Meiners / Whitney Ellis6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKerri Morgan / Emily McMillen vs Laura Buchanan / Martha Benbow3-6, 3-6
2025-08-14vs Yadkin/Gregory/18+/8.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Cobb / Susanna Ringeman vs Laura Buchanan / Whitney Ellis2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKerri Morgan / Emily McMillen vs Sarah Cline / Cari Powell6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 - Thursday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Molly Ehrig
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.08
Emily McMillen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.95
Holly Hinshelwood
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.95
Sally Eagleton
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.80
Lindsay Ray
published
3.74
Katherine Beach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Kimberly Busse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Kerri Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Susanna Ringeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Ehrig
27W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
4.22
4
Emily McMillen
28W–1L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Holly Hinshelwood
24W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
Lindsay Ray
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Katherine Beach
14W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Kimberly Busse
18W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.66
Kerri Morgan
4W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Susanna Ringeman
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.