Teams

Greene

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS 18 & OVER MIXED DOUBLES · MIXED 18 & OVER 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-08vs Harrison MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Butler / Joe Lucci vs Bryan Williams / Megan Atterbury2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEric Boehling / Kimberly Selsky vs Mollie McKay / David Kimbrough7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesThomas Hooker / Madison Seidel vs Cari Hopson / Wesley Edwards0-6, 0-6
2025-06-04vs Wescott/WaddleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Selsky / Eric Boehling vs Matthew Hilliard / Ali Cause3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Mattingly / Joe Lucci vs Chris Hoenig / Katie Greene1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMadison Seidel / Ryan Skane vs Jennifer Wescott / Christopher Soule3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 18 & OVER 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Denise Vliet
published 4
3.63
Kristen Butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Madison Seidel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.58
Kimberly Selsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Eric Boehling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Deedee Greene
published 4
3.51
Julia Mattingly
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.44
Ryan Skane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Julia Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Albert Cottle
published 3.5
3.20
Evelyn Foster
published 3.5
3.15
Mike Jolley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Thomas Hooker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Lucci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Mattingly + Thomas Hooker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Denise Vliet
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Butler
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Madison Seidel
52W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Kimberly Selsky
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Eric Boehling
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Deedee Greene
13W–32L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Julia Mattingly
59W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Ryan Skane
34W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Julia Griffin
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Albert Cottle
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Evelyn Foster
28W–20L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Mike Jolley
22W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Thomas Hooker
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
Joe Lucci
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.