Teams

Athey

2023 USTA 55 & Over League · 9.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-06vs WitmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Athey / Beckie Beazley vs Terri Mrozinski / Jill Frey8-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Dodd / Brenda Moran vs Michele Mccartney / Elizabeth O'Donnell8-3
W#3 DoublesAnn Clark / Nancy Opilo vs Jane Ackerman / Margaret Beaver8-2
2023-08-06vs WitmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Bryner / Kathy Montgomery vs Michele Mccartney / Jill Frey8-4
W#2 DoublesBrenda Moran / Laura Athey vs Jane Ackerman / Amber Kroh8-4
W#3 DoublesAnn Clark / Nancy Opilo vs Margaret Beaver / Marianne Michels8-4
2023-08-06vs WitmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Bryner / Julie Dodd vs Terri Mrozinski / Elizabeth O'Donnell8-0
W#2 DoublesBeckie Beazley / Kathy Montgomery vs Teresa Clark / Marianne Michels8-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Clark / Nancy Opilo vs Karen Sipe / Amber Kroh8-1
2023-08-06vs WitmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Dodd / Laura Athey vs Jane Ackerman / Terri Mrozinski8-2
W#2 DoublesPatricia Bryner / Beckie Beazley vs Elizabeth O'Donnell / Marianne Michels8-0
W#3 DoublesBrenda Moran / Kathy Montgomery vs Amber Kroh / Jill Frey8-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Athey04120027
2Witmer040121296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Laura Athey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Ann Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Nancy Opilo
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
Brenda Moran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Beckie Beazley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Dodd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Bryner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Bryner + Laura Athey5170% gamesnot enough data
Laura Athey + Julie Dodd303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Laura Athey
124W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Ann Clark
45W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Nancy Opilo
334W–191L career · 11 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brenda Moran
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Beckie Beazley
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Dodd
16W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Montgomery
53W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Bryner
24W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.