Teams

Schneiderman/Memphis

2024 Mixed 40 & Over - Memphis · 3.0 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-16vs Ensell/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Winstead / Tina Schneiderman vs Matthew Beickert / Christine Mendoza2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Patrone / Robert O'Bryan vs Xiaoqun Akers / Malcolm Pratt1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJo Picha / Christopher Heimann vs Johnny Kolwyck / Monica Gallimore6-4, 6-1
2024-07-15vs Ensell/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Patrone / Christopher Heimann vs Matthew Beickert / Xiaoqun Akers0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTina Schneiderman / William Winstead vs Amasa Lacy / Malcolm Pratt6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJo Picha / Edgar Contreras vs Stuart Breakstone / Lisa Monahan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-15vs Ensell/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Schneiderman / William Winstead vs Matthew Beickert / Lisa Monahan3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert O'Bryan / Susan Patrone vs Amasa Lacy / James French4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Mixed 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Higgins/Memphis7116821215
2Cooper/Memphis44131124197
3Schneiderman/Memphis1771736253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Tina Schneiderman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Jo Picha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
William Winstead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Robert O'Bryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Constance Conley
published 3
2.80
Edgar Contreras
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Christopher Heimann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.38
Susan Patrone
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Alfredo Moran
published 2.5
Tommy Conley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Patrone + Robert O'Bryan0531% gamesnot enough data
Constance Conley + Tommy Conley044 matchesnot enough data
Jo Picha + Christopher Heimann314 matchesnot enough data
Jo Picha + William Winstead303 matchesnot enough data
William Winstead + Tina Schneiderman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Schneiderman
49W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
Jo Picha
55W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
William Winstead
65W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.13
Robert O'Bryan
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Constance Conley
29W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Edgar Contreras
30W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christopher Heimann
30W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Susan Patrone
33W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Alfredo Moran
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tommy Conley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.