Teams

IE-CCCC-The Rebels-Amy Taylor/Sesilie Kay

2021 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-13Won 20
W#1 DoublesShirley Landers / Jennifer Kries vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSesilie Kay / Amy Taylor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-06vs IE-SLCC-Michele WalterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShirley Landers / Rebecca Villar vs Cristina Reed / Tammy Pronenko6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHeidi Brun / Monette Schwartz vs Wendy Seirup / Kim Jensen3-6, 3-6
2021-10-31vs IE-LLW-Kathy CockerLost 01
L#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Carmen Underwood vs Susan Lacina / Cristina Hamlin0-6, 1-6
2021-10-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesSesilie Kay / Amy Garrett vs Catherine Leogrande / Lori Hazelton6-1, 6-3
2021-10-10vs IE-LLW-Kathy CockerLost 02
L#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Carmen Underwood vs Susan Lacina / Kathalena Cocker1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSheila Palmer / Heidi Brun vs Kelly Barhorst / Stephanie Ells1-6, 0-6
2021-10-03vs IE-MTC-Jeanne ShelterLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeidi Brun / Lydia Wong vs Elizabeth Bentley / Maureen Duncan1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Martina Masarani
published
3.60
Jennifer Kries
published 4
3.42
Ilse Ungeheuer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Shirley Landers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Heidi Brun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Lydia Wong
published
2.82
Jo Russo-Pereyra
published 3
2.73
Annette Flores
published 3
2.73
Sesilie Kay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Sheila Palmer
published
Monette Schwartz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sesilie Kay + Heidi Brun6350% games+0.9% vs expected
Sesilie Kay + Jo Russo-Pereyra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martina Masarani
17W–6L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jennifer Kries
102W–95L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Ilse Ungeheuer
89W–80L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Shirley Landers
29W–62L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Heidi Brun
139W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Lydia Wong
14W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Jo Russo-Pereyra
79W–72L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Annette Flores
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Sesilie Kay
134W–145L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Sheila Palmer
8W–11L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
2.64
Monette Schwartz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.