Teams

FCCC PURPLE

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-12vs LAC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJana Burns / Julie Chan vs Amy Grolnick / Amy Paterra1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Benz / Sherry McCoy vs Milena Halek / Barbara Dingwall5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-05vs LT WHITELost 03
L#1 DoublesCrystal Osthoff / Libbie Hickman vs Lisa Martin / Lora Griffith2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Brooks / Pam Raab vs Bettina Cosima Larrarte / Cindy Short0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Taylor / Denise Benz vs Tina Spicer / Bernita Sterling2-6, 1-6
2026-05-29vs CSU GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesKara Brown / Jane Roberti vs Maka Hammock / Debra Olson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKate Laudon / Pam Raab vs Vicky Kmetz / Tracy Sanders2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Taylor / Denise Benz vs Sue Schneider / Sherri Wera6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-22vs LT BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesKara Brown / Jane Roberti vs Debbie Stechman / Kathleen Vandenberg2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLibbie Hickman / Crystal Osthoff vs Camille Benton / Leslie Taylor6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Benz / Michelle Taylor vs Kristen Philbrook / Mary Beth Weir2-6, 3-6
2026-05-15vs HMTC TEALLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Laudon / Julie Chan vs Lori Masi / Susan Seiler6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnn Davidson / Teresa Nugent vs Mary Gabiola / Kelley Knudson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Brooks / Libbie Hickman vs Marcee Gustafson / Diane Westlind4-6, 1-6
2026-05-08vs LAC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesMolly Skold / Jana Burns vs Mary Ellen O'Rell / Amy Paterra6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanice Brooks / Sherry McCoy vs Amy Grolnick / Milena Halek2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Roberti / Ann Davidson vs Barbara Dingwall / Christy Hilmas6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-01vs LT WHITELost 12
L#1 DoublesJana Burns / Pam Raab vs Bettina Cosima Larrarte / Cathy Simocko-Smith1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCrystal Osthoff / Libbie Hickman vs Lisa Martin / Marcia Stauter4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanice Brooks / Julie Chan vs Janice Sale / Helen Migchelbrink2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LAC RED43111025195
2FCCC PURPLE0751635219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Crystal Osthoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Jana Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Molly Skold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Kara Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Jane Roberti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Sherry McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Libbie Hickman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Janice Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Denise Benz
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.44
Teresa Nugent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Laudon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Pam Raab
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Roberti + Molly Skold2345% gamesnot enough data
Crystal Osthoff + Libbie Hickman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Crystal Osthoff
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Jana Burns
41W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Molly Skold
45W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kara Brown
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Jane Roberti
66W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sherry McCoy
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Libbie Hickman
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Janice Brooks
21W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Denise Benz
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Teresa Nugent
6W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Kate Laudon
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pam Raab
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.