Teams

Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2022 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

20 players · average NTRP 4.04 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-13vs Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/AllenSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Angela Bleak6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiffany Olson / Pam Ollivier vs Lisa Bullington / Mindy Christofferson3-6, 3-6
2022-10-06vs Sports Mall-Kasteler/AffleckLost 14
L#1 DoublesJill Ford / Lisa Mayberry vs Tiffany Kasteler / Taeeui Ham2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle McGill vs Dorene Sambado4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Olson / Shelli Johnston vs Jodie Monson / Gretchen Soffe1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Kathleen Covey vs Kristi Roggensack / Kelly Norton4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesHalli Craft / Kimberlie Bayne vs Anji DowDell / Natalie Watts6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-09-29vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterWon 31
W#1 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Karen Christensen vs Sue Smith / Shauna Carter6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Lindsey Ramage6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKimberlie Bayne / Brenda Fowler vs Megan Warren / Tiffany Pierce1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJill Ford / Sherilyn Rawlings vs Shannon Shepherd / Janice Stokes-Burns6-3, 6-1
2022-09-22vs Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/HronekWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Olson / Shelli Johnston vs Rachel Labrum / Lisa Caldwell7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTaylor Kirk / Halli Craft vs Rosa McGuire / Nicole Mills6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTena Maughan / Cynthia Hall vs Ann Hronek / Deyce Peterson0-6, 4-6
2022-09-15vs Sports Mall-Romney/AdamsonWon 50
W#1 DoublesCambria Cook / Taylor Kirk vs Susan Knight / Kyra Dunshee6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesSherilyn Rawlings vs Berit Campion6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Kathleen Covey vs Maggie Rios / Rachel Mills6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTena Maughan / Brenda Fowler vs Carolee Romney / Ann Trentman6-0, 6-2
W#4 DoublesHalli Craft / Karen Christensen vs Kimberly Holmstrom / Allison Leishman6-2, 6-3
2022-09-08vs Ivory Ridge-Brockbank/AllenLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Ford / Brenda Fowler vs Jana Fairbanks / Cara Hassey4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTiffany Olson / Michelle McGill vs Trista Willardson / Lori Taylor3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesTaylor Kirk / Pam Ollivier vs Angela Bleak / Heather Jensen6-2, 6-1
2022-09-01vs Sports Mall-Kasteler/AffleckLost 23
L#1 DoublesKaren Christensen / Belinda Jensen vs Anji DowDell / Laura Johnston4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Tiffany Kasteler6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCynthia Hall / Kim Santiago vs Christy Owens / JaNae Smith4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Covey / Tena Maughan vs Kristel Affleck / Lindie Hoggan6-2, 7-5
L#4 DoublesHalli Craft / Michelle McGill vs Kelly Norton / Kristi Roggensack4-6, 6-7
2022-08-25vs Sunpro-Warren/CarterLost 12
L#1 DoublesBelinda Jensen / Sherilyn Rawlings vs Karen Nielson / Shauna Carter3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJill Ford / Lisa Mayberry vs Megan Warren / Shannon Shepherd4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Olson / Pam Ollivier vs Kortney Osborne / Cheryl Harker7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cambria Cook
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Taylor Kirk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.78
Lisa Mayberry
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.72
Tiffany Olson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.72
Michelle Ainge
published 4
3.69
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.65
Jill Ford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Michelle McGill
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.60
Kimberlie Bayne
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Shelli Johnston
usually #4 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Valerie Blackhurst
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Cynthia Hall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Karen Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Covey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Ollivier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford6159% games+13.5% vs expected
Tiffany Olson + Brenda Fowler8356% games+10.2% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Lisa Mayberry3360% games+8.0% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.0% vs expected
Halli Craft + Kim Santiago4158% games+4.8% vs expected
Cynthia Hall + Pam Ollivier4253% games+4.7% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Tiffany Olson3357% games+4.6% vs expected
Shelli Johnston + Jill Ford4355% games+4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cambria Cook
32W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Belinda Jensen
150W–92L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
Taylor Kirk
80W–14L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Mayberry
80W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Tiffany Olson
115W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Michelle Ainge
54W–38L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
136W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jill Ford
86W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Michelle McGill
56W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Kimberlie Bayne
95W–123L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Brenda Fowler
87W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 7 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Halli Craft
62W–48L career · 4 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · 1 line in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.40
4
Cynthia Hall
24W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.38
Karen Christensen
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Covey
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pam Ollivier
67W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.