Teams

Weeks (Day) Fall 2026 Combo

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-27vs Kear/LepariLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshby Neal / Elizabeth Gonzalez vs Susan Morgante / Brenda DiMeglio6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoyce Jordan / Ginger Wessell vs Gail Willis / Lisa Stenger4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Hammond / Josie Whitmore vs Ewa Marziano / Robyn Schneider7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-26vs Doss 55+ ComboLost 12
W#1 DoublesJoyce Jordan / Ashby Neal vs Kristen FitzGerald / Joelle Crocker6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnne Hammond / Belinda Landis vs Robyn Doss / Ghilaine Dallaire3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCasi Healey / Lisa Weeks vs Elizabeth Basso / Lorraine Lee5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-08-21vs Pelton/Daly DAYLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Bowers / Elizabeth Gonzalez vs Lynn Dallachie / Dawn McKenna6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAshby Neal / Anne Hammond vs Pamela Tharrington / Lisa Daly6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerri Smith / Casi Healey vs Sandy Cissel / Gail Conklin5-7, 4-4
2026-08-12vs Ferner ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Bowers / Elizabeth Gonzalez vs Chris Knoll / Lisa Keeton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJosie Whitmore / Ashby Neal vs Becky Benson / Christine Tryer6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesIlona Johnson / LeAnn Pierce vs Dorothy Crumpton / Libbie Schaffer1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fenton/Richard D2051332
2Pelton/Daly DAY2042546
3Cesareo (DAY)1030013
4Graeser 2026 55+ 6.5 Combo1021327
5Weeks (Day) Fall 2026 Combo1133754
6MacCall000000
7Stephanski/Hollett-Mott000000
8Sample 55-6.5000000
9Ferner Combo0112430
10Lemmons (Day)0112530
11Doss 55+ Combo0112531
12Kear/Lepari0103636
13Kontoulas DAY02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Joyce Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Ilona Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Deborah Starns
published 3.5
3.10
Ashby Neal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Lisa Weeks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
LeAnn Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Nancy Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Belinda Landis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Ginger Wessell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Casi Healey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Anne Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Josie Whitmore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ilona Johnson + Ashby Neal5454% games+1.9% vs expected
Ginger Wessell + Belinda Landis3354% games−6.3% vs expected
Nancy Bowers + Ginger Wessell404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Jordan
29W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Ilona Johnson
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Deborah Starns
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Ashby Neal
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
Lisa Weeks
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
LeAnn Pierce
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Nancy Bowers
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Belinda Landis
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Ginger Wessell
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Casi Healey
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Anne Hammond
1W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Josie Whitmore
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.