Teams

B2 Ridgetop Blouch

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.08 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-08vs B9 Salisbury RiegelWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Douglas Scammell vs Whitley Day / John Spichiger6-0, 6-2
2023-06-01vs B7 Willow Oaks CC DuntonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Robinson / Douglas Scammell vs Zachary Cohen / Ben Barbour6-0, 6-3
2023-05-25vs B5 Avalon McCarty LitesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Douglas Scammell vs Chip Gay / Tejas Raval6-3, 6-4
2023-05-18vs B3 Raintree Raghavan RenegadesLost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Robinson / Douglas Scammell vs Geoff Campbell / Lee Brooks4-6, 2-6
2023-05-04vs B8 Burkwood McKelveyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Scammell / Brian Zollinhofer vs Michael Hazelwood / Turner Cole2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-27vs B6 Westwood GilmanWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Zollinhofer / Douglas Scammell vs Brian Rabhan / Josh Reynal6-3, 6-1
2023-04-13vs B1 Hermitage FisherWon 10
W#2 DoublesColin Atkinson / Brian Zollinhofer vs Mac Stuckey / Bryan Fisher6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Brian Zollinhofer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Charles Wayland
published 4.5
3.92
Douglas Scammell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Greg Robinson
published 4
3.84
Robert Turner
published
3.81
Robert Wainscott
published
3.79
Jory Brinkerhoff
published
3.75
William Pilc
published
3.72
Ryan Politowicz
published
3.71
Colin Atkinson
published 4
3.57
Jeff Kane
published
3.27
Doug Blouch
published 3.5
Jason Fenchuk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Scammell + Brian Zollinhofer11164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Zollinhofer
212W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Charles Wayland
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Douglas Scammell
102W–57L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Greg Robinson
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Robert Turner
16W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Robert Wainscott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
Jory Brinkerhoff
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
William Pilc
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.75
Ryan Politowicz
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Colin Atkinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Jeff Kane
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Doug Blouch
26W–29L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Jason Fenchuk
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.