Teams

MParker (OPRC)

2022 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-22vs TRamsay (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesJenny Havens vs Kathleen Johnstone6-3, 6-1
2022-07-08vs TRamsay (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 SinglesTara Croom vs Priscilla Navarrete7-6, 6-2
2022-07-01vs TRamsay (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 SinglesJenny Havens vs Bilan Mo6-2, 6-4
2022-06-22vs TRamsay (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 SinglesJenny Havens vs Priscilla Navarrete6-2, 6-2
2022-06-02vs TRamsay (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTara Croom vs Lea Powell3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Jenny Havens
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.62
Sara Lineberger
published
3.49
Mary Parker
published
3.35
Kim Walsh
published
3.17
Sandra Troni
published
3.10
Tara Croom
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jenny Havens
78W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
Sara Lineberger
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Mary Parker
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
Kim Walsh
22W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
Sandra Troni
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Tara Croom
43W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.