Teams

Holt

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 6.5 Ladies

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-24vs SnowWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Hyland / Gina Stewart vs Margaret Collier / Adriana Colliton6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Holt / Tricia Spann vs Marcel Kerr / Cecilia Gallardo Solano6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Baugh / Rachel Richter vs Jordan Watson / Katherine Dickinson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Gina Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Julie Baugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kimberly Holt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Rachel Richter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Laura Spears
published
3.22
Renee Yackira
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Danielle Woods
published 3.5
3.16
Michelle Hyland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Ruby Hudnall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Michel Umphrey
published
3.01
Tricia Spann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Jane Schmidt
published
2.83
Gina Thompson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Hyland + Gina Thompson1543% games+2.3% vs expected
Julie Baugh + Renee Yackira10956% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gina Stewart
22W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.67
Julie Baugh
51W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Kimberly Holt
25W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Rachel Richter
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Laura Spears
27W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Renee Yackira
47W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Danielle Woods
20W–17L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Michelle Hyland
35W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Ruby Hudnall
22W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Michel Umphrey
25W–12L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.02
Tricia Spann
28W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Jane Schmidt
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Gina Thompson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.