Teams

Longwood Wilson-Snyder

2022 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-26vs Jacaranda Flaming DragonsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Malika Apple vs SueAnn Sanders / Annthonia Prossi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobyn Rhodes / Tanya Kelly vs Jet Sagalow / Mary Evelyn Guyton6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDorene Seider / Joyce Bastarache vs Jennifer Godfrey / Sue Green1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Hannigan / Judith Lubbers vs Christina Solomon / Linda Radovich6-3, 6-2
2022-03-19vs Lakewood National TrefilWon 40
W#1 DoublesLenore Funes / Robyn Rhodes vs Kelly Depalo / Margaret Kirkland6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDorene Seider / Lynn Inganamort vs Susie DuDeVoire / Nichole Bontell7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKristen Keyser vs Lisa Simotes6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Hannigan / Michelle Coates vs Wanda Gilbert / Cynthia Norwood6-0, 6-2
2022-03-05vs LWR NicholsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Beth Costa vs Sheila Perry / Barbara Cogen6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesManda Jordan / Kristine Szarkowitz vs Katie Emmons / Betty Jo Zeigler7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-26vs LWR For the Love of itWon 40
W#1 DoublesMalika Apple / Judith Lubbers vs Meagan Milne / Claudia Schwab6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Hannigan / Dorene Seider vs Marcia Frost / Barbara Moore6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKristen Keyser vs Lauren Larkin6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLenore Funes / Robyn Rhodes vs Sandra Barkey / Lisa Tschetter6-1, 6-0
2022-02-19vs Laurel Oak CarpenterWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristine Szarkowitz / Manda Jordan vs Tanya Keith / Keely Crosby6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoyce Bastarache / Michelle Coates vs Sandra Poston / Carrie Walsh6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDorene Seider / Judith Lubbers vs Jennifer Stroble / Teri Sayre5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-12vs Jacaranda Flaming DragonsWon 21
W#2 DoublesBeth Costa / Judith Lubbers vs Jet Sagalow / Heather Chapell6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKristen Keyser vs Deanna Allard3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTanya Kelly / Patricia Dipierro vs Ana Areosa / Petra Klos0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-29vs Lakewood National TrefilWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristine Szarkowitz / Manda Jordan vs Lu Circelli / Natalie Bloch6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDonna Hannigan / Karen Collins vs Andrea Johnson / Roda Rucks6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKristen Keyser vs Kelly Depalo6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKristen Keyser vs Pamela Mogul2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Karen Collins vs Haley English / Kimberly LaLima4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Costa / Kristine Szarkowitz vs Kara Beene / Nancy Finman6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-08vs LWR For the Love of itWon 30
W#1 SinglesKristen Keyser vs Marcia Frost6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Dorene Seider vs Karen Buelter / Meagan Milne6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLenore Funes / Donna Hannigan vs Sandra Barkey / Lisa Tschetter6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Beth Costa
published 4.5
3.81
3.80
Kristen Keyser
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Michelle Coates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Judith Lubbers
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.71
Donna Hannigan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.64
Karen Collins
published
3.60
Dorene Seider
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Kristine Szarkowitz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Lynn Inganamort
published
Robyn Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tanya Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judith Lubbers + Robyn Rhodes8458% games+3.9% vs expected
Donna Hannigan + Dorene Seider91945% games−6.5% vs expected
Donna Hannigan + Judith Lubbers12758% gamesnot enough data
Donna Hannigan + Michelle Coates7848% gamesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Judith Lubbers3444% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Kelly + Robyn Rhodes5258% gamesnot enough data
Dorene Seider + Kristine Szarkowitz2437% gamesnot enough data
Judith Lubbers + Michelle Coates314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Costa
26W–16L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.09
4
Anna Bacher Brown
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Kristen Keyser
69W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Michelle Coates
52W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judith Lubbers
220W–129L career · 8 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Donna Hannigan
147W–127L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Karen Collins
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Dorene Seider
109W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Kristine Szarkowitz
30W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
Lynn Inganamort
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robyn Rhodes
71W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tanya Kelly
65W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.