Teams

TOCC - Bourcy

2025 2.5 Adult Men's Fun League · Men 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-30vs Findley/Knight BBTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Mathis / Joe Johnston vs Dale Brehm / Darin Berdine1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Bourcy vs Kris Findley6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-09vs Findley/Knight BBTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Johnston / Mark Mathis vs Dale Brehm / Kris Findley4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSolly Chedid vs Trevor Rockstad2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPete Mitchell / Benjamin Bourcy vs Darin Berdine / Scott Pridgen6-1, 6-0
2025-04-07vs Findley/Knight BBTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesPete Mitchell / Solly Chedid vs Dale Brehm / Scott Pridgen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Burkhard / Mark Mathis vs Darin Berdine / Christopher Smith1-6, 0-6
2025-03-19vs Findley/Knight BBTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPete Mitchell / Brad Lahaie vs Dale Brehm / JOHN ONEAL2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMark Mathis vs Darin Berdine1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Bourcy / Chuck Burkhard vs Schaeffer Dane / Christopher Smith0-6, 5-7
2025-03-10vs Findley/Knight BBTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoe Johnston / Pete Mitchell vs Dale Brehm / Scott Pridgen2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Lahaie / Benjamin Bourcy vs Jason Sumrall / Kevin Henn2-6, 3-6
2025-02-24vs Findley/Knight BBTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesChuck Burkhard / Joe Johnston vs Kevin Henn / Tyler Patin0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSolly Chedid vs Dale Brehm6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMark Mathis / Brad Lahaie vs Jason Sumrall / Darin Berdine2-6, 0-6
2025-02-19vs Findley/Knight BBTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPete Mitchell / Chuck Burkhard vs Trevor Rockstad / Scott Pridgen0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMark Mathis vs Kris Findley5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJoe Johnston / Solly Chedid vs Kevin Henn / JOHN ONEAL2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Benjamin Bourcy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.32
Brad Lahaie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Chuck Burkhard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.09
Solly Chedid
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.00
Joe Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mark Mathis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Benjamin Bourcy
21W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Brad Lahaie
8W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Chuck Burkhard
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Solly Chedid
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Joe Johnston
4W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Mark Mathis
3W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.