← Teams

SHC-Lane

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Sharon Place
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Heck
published 3
2.56
Gina Mandel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results6 ties
2023-11-19Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesIvy Lane / Sharon Place vs Alana Rhea / Trish Carder6-3, 6-1
2023-11-11Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesSharon Place / Elicia Putnam vs Karin Owens / Lisa Smith6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPerla Lewis / Gina Mandel vs Gail Roche / Brenda Strombo6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSharon Place / Perla Lewis vs Dorota Kolinska / Rosalie Trevejo6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-07Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesGina Mandel / Lillian Lee vs Pamela Grant / Jennifer Thompson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-29Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesPerla Lewis / Sharon Place vs Karen Kraus / Sarah Larson6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGina Mandel / Elicia Putnam vs Theresa Luthi / Sanae Ito6-2, 7-6
2023-09-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesGina Mandel / Perla Lewis vs Joyce Swift / Natasha Brady6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Sharon Place
38W–30L career
6%91%3%
2.75
3
Nancy Heck
17W–17L career
6%92%2%
2.73
3
Gina Mandel
21W–32L career
30%70%1%
2.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.