Teams

Butera/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 2.5 Women FRI AM

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-15vs Stempel/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSabrina Butera / Jourdan Hurd vs Stephanie Speller / Lynne Falk1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Garrett / Kari Scott vs Jane Doe / Sheila Larson6-2, 6-0
2024-11-01vs Hall/Williamson/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Simmons / Sarah Garrett vs Megan Forrest / Sarah White7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHannah South / Jourdan Hurd vs Lorie Dove / Madelyn Knowles6-2, 6-0
2024-10-18vs Medlin/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSabrina Butera vs Erin Worman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Bodnar / Kari Scott vs Caroline Royalty / Pamela Leonard6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-04vs Corbin/NashvilleSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSarah Garrett vs Kristin Reichert6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJourdan Hurd / Rachael Mitchell vs Sara Hampel / Meg Sandman0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
ASHLEY CUA
published 3
2.73
Samantha Bodnar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Kari Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Hannah South
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Jourdan Hurd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.48
Sarah Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Sabrina Butera
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.74
Carrie Hay
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah South + Kari Scott404 matchesnot enough data
Kari Scott + Samantha Bodnar314 matchesnot enough data
Sabrina Butera + Jourdan Hurd213 matchesnot enough data
Sabrina Butera + Sarah Garrett123 matchesnot enough data
Jourdan Hurd + Kari Scott213 matchesnot enough data
Jourdan Hurd + ASHLEY CUA213 matchesnot enough data
Kari Scott + Sarah Garrett213 matchesnot enough data
Samantha Bodnar + ASHLEY CUA303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
ASHLEY CUA
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Samantha Bodnar
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Kari Scott
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Hannah South
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%29%71%
2.58
Jourdan Hurd
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.56
Sarah Garrett
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Sabrina Butera
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Carrie Hay
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.