Teams

LATA 5.0M 18 & Over (Hinson)

18 & Over · 5.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesLane Hinson / Sean Nguyen vs Eric Perez / Gregory Zlobinsky6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrew Kiser vs Marcos Borobia Arias4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew de Groot / William Wiggins vs Josh Smith / Donald Bruner6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMatthew de Groot / William Wiggins vs Josh Smith / Dave Welch6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAndrew Kiser vs Eric Perez1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLane Hinson / Sean Nguyen vs Donald Bruner / Marcos Borobia Arias6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA 5.0M 18 & Over (Hinson)2042545
2LCTA (A) 5.0M 18 & Over (Greathouse)0224856

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Lane Hinson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Andrew Kiser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.61
Sean Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.39
Jordan Hunter
published
Matthew de Groot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Nguyen + Lane Hinson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lane Hinson
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.78
5
Andrew Kiser
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sean Nguyen
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
Jordan Hunter
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
Matthew de Groot
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.