Teams

GJTC TSTOUFFER

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-19vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 50
W#1 DoublesEric Wilhelm / Jeff Cradit vs Nathaniel Higginson / Jonathan Sanchez6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Omar Bou-Matar6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKriss Burwell / Trey Parker vs Brian Birch / Scott Collister6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar vs Todd Rowell6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStan Scott / Dan Terrell vs Bryan Martin / Doug Larson6-4, 7-6
2026-05-12vs GJTC OBOU-MATARSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTrey Parker / Timothy Stouffer vs Brian Birch / Scott Collister7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKriss Burwell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDan Terrell / Stan Scott vs Nathaniel Higginson / Andrew W Smith3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJeff Cradit / Eric Wilhelm vs Doug Larson / Jonathan Sanchez4-6, 3-6
2026-04-28vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 32
W#1 DoublesDan Terrell / Stan Scott vs Omar Bou-Matar / Brian Birch7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Jonathan Sanchez7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKriss Burwell / Eric Wilhelm vs Bryan Martin / Doug Larson3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesTrey Parker vs Nathaniel Higginson6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Cradit / Sugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar vs Andrew W Smith / Scott Collister6-4, 6-3
2026-04-21vs GJTC OBOU-MATARLost 23
W#1 DoublesDan Terrell / Timothy Stouffer vs Todd Rowell / Brian Birch6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesEric Wilhelm vs Jonathan Sanchez4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKriss Burwell / Matthew Charts vs Doug Larson / Omar Bou-Matar6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar vs Bryan Martin7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeff Cradit / Stan Scott vs Nathaniel Higginson / Andrew W Smith5-7, 5-7
2026-04-19vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 32
L#1 DoublesDan Terrell / Jeff Cradit vs Omar Bou-Matar / Jonathan Sanchez3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Todd Rowell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKriss Burwell / Sugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar vs Andrew W Smith / Doug Larson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTrey Parker vs Brian Birch6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTimothy Stouffer / Eric Wilhelm vs Bryan Martin / Nathaniel Higginson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-07vs GJTC OBOU-MATARWon 41
W#1 DoublesStan Scott / Sugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar vs Todd Rowell / Bryan Martin6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTrey Parker vs Omar Bou-Matar6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKriss Burwell / Timothy Stouffer vs Doug Larson / Brian Birch3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Andrew W Smith6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJeff Cradit / Eric Wilhelm vs Jonathan Sanchez / Scott Collister7-5, 6-0
2026-03-31vs GJTC OBOU-MATARSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJeff Cradit / Eric Wilhelm vs Todd Rowell / Brian Birch6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Nathaniel Higginson6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTimothy Stouffer vs Jonathan Sanchez2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar / Trey Parker vs Doug Larson / Bryan Martin6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Trey Parker
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.99
Sugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.98
Matthew Charts
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.88
Eric Wilhelm
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.86
Stan Scott
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Jeff Cradit
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.71
Dan Terrell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Timothy Stouffer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.42
Kriss Burwell
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Wilhelm + Jeff Cradit8652% games+0.6% vs expected
Dan Terrell + Stan Scott2536% games−9.1% vs expected
Matthew Charts + Kriss Burwell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trey Parker
6W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Sugesh Koranki Ramesh Kumar
14W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Matthew Charts
63W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Eric Wilhelm
8W–9L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Stan Scott
34W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jeff Cradit
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Dan Terrell
18W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Timothy Stouffer
30W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Kriss Burwell
23W–106L career · 6 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.