Teams

Raulston

2022 Norfolk Adult 55 & Over · 2022 Norfolk Adult 55 & Over Women 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Snowden-Gordon / Shelley Smith vs Ellen Jaffe / Laura Mitchell5-7, 4-6
2022-08-13vs StoneSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHerma Ahlers / Carina Simpson vs Laura Mitchell / Deborah Brewster4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSheryl Raulston / Shelley Smith vs Christopher Witherspoon / Karen Adcock7-5, 6-3
2022-07-23vs StoneLost 02
L#1 DoublesHerma Ahlers / Karen Johnson vs Laura Stone / Tammy Mavromatis6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Courage / Marie Magee vs Michelle Mahoney / Ellen Jaffe3-6, 6-7
2022-07-16vs StoneSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHerma Ahlers / Sheryl Raulston vs Deborah Brewster / Christopher Witherspoon3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Courage / Marie Magee vs Karen Adcock / Teresa Jett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-25vs StoneSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAngela Gilliam / Herma Ahlers vs Deborah Brewster / Laura Stone4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSheryl Raulston / Shelley Smith vs Christopher Witherspoon / Tammy Mavromatis3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-18vs StoneSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHerma Ahlers / Susan Willard vs Suzanne Breit / Beverley Mason6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Courage / Karen Johnson vs Tammy Mavromatis / Christopher Witherspoon2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Norfolk Adult 55 & Over Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Susan Willard
published
Angela Gilliam
published 4.5
4.25
Herma Ahlers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.22
Charo Aguilar
published 4.5
4.02
Carina Simpson
published 4.5
3.88
Tijen Ireland
published 4
3.80
Shelley Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.70
Mary Snowden-Gordon
published
3.60
Kathy Courage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Molly Nissman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Courage + Shelley Smith31239% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Willard
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Angela Gilliam
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Herma Ahlers
38W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Charo Aguilar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Carina Simpson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Tijen Ireland
83W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4.5
Shelley Smith
30W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
3.80
Mary Snowden-Gordon
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Kathy Courage
27W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Molly Nissman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.