Teams

NMurphy (WSRC)

2026 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-24vs SAsby/LSelland (Sardis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesShay Hartley / Lynn Davis vs Lori Andersen / Teri Snoke2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Pizii / Kathy Aitken vs Tracy Graham / Sharon Storck2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKim Bivens / Gayle Gold vs Lynn Selland / Becky Shopf0-6, 2-6
2026-04-17vs KPredmore (Jeff Adams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Wilson / Kim Pizii vs Kristine Predmore / Donna Musante3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Lacroix / Lynn Davis vs Wendy Clendening / Melissa Habegger1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Aitken / Jacqui Gentile vs Laura Cass / Gretchen Hildner1-6, 3-6
2026-04-10vs BBrown (Park Crossing)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Pizii / Nanette Murphy vs Jinna Harmon / Susan McGinn2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelli Massaro / Jacqui Gentile vs Cherie Bouchon / Rebecca Brown6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGayle Gold / Tracey Loughlin-Young vs Allison Woerner / Suzanne Hair1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-03vs LWallace/BHoff (Carmel)Split 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Wilson / Kim Pizii vs Susan Taylor / Laura Wallace5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Bivens / Judy Knechtel vs Heidi Friedman / Janat Schramm2-6, 3-6
2026-03-27vs BLothe/LLober (Mason Wallace)Won 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Moran / Lisa Wilson vs Lisa Dunning / Kyna Savedge5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Aitken / Allyson Dantino vs Rebecca Lothe / Lorie Lewis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTracy Lacroix / Nanette Murphy vs Debby Bosselman / Bridget Megginson6-1, 6-3
2026-03-20vs JSanderson (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKim Pizii / Lisa Wilson vs Mindy Martin / Jan Nomina6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLynn Davis / Shay Hartley vs Virginia Herran / Jean Sanderson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudy Knechtel / Kathy Aitken vs Nannette Markham / Tina Hough6-7, 5-7
2026-03-13vs EUnderwood (Russell)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Moran / Kelli Massaro vs Janet Fiedor / Terri Hood4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJacqui Gentile / Tracy Lacroix vs Linda Glass / Michele Collins1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAllyson Dantino / Kim Bivens vs Kate Palanica / Ellen Underwood1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allyson Dantino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Kim Pizii
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Shay Hartley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Kelli Massaro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Nanette Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Kim Bivens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Tracy Lacroix
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Gayle Gold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kathy Aitken
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Jacqui Gentile
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.67
Judy Knechtel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Moran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey Loughlin-Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Pizii + Tracy Lacroix5252% gamesnot enough data
Kim Pizii + Shay Hartley2546% gamesnot enough data
Shay Hartley + Gayle Gold3447% gamesnot enough data
Jacqui Gentile + Tracy Lacroix2442% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Lacroix + Nanette Murphy5067% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Lacroix + Shay Hartley2355% gamesnot enough data
Kim Pizii + Kelli Massaro044 matchesnot enough data
Kim Pizii + Nanette Murphy224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allyson Dantino
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Kim Pizii
42W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Shay Hartley
36W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Kelli Massaro
56W–83L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Nanette Murphy
87W–70L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.89
Kim Bivens
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Tracy Lacroix
50W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Gayle Gold
37W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Kathy Aitken
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Jacqui Gentile
95W–98L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Judy Knechtel
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Karen Moran
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracey Loughlin-Young
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.